“Is the AI capability real, or is it a slide?”
We run the system we sell
Buy the capability from someone who runs it daily, not someone who read about it. The consultancy itself operates on the same agent and automation stack it builds for clients.
- Client
- Janettix itself
- Scope
- AI operations
Disclosure. Operator proof, and the only case study here that needs nobody’s permission. Included because the second service line should be shown rather than asserted.
The problem
A solo practice serving fifteen clients has one binding constraint, and it is not skill. It is hours.
The usual answer is to hire, which changes the economics and introduces the exact failure buyers complain about most — the person who sold the work stops being the person who does it.
What was done
- 01
Catalog and data pipelines
Source-of-truth catalogues that reconcile to the live storefront, with dry runs before any write and no automatic removals.
- 02
Reporting automation
Live dashboards deployed on edge hosting, replacing the assembled monthly deck.
- 03
Research workflows
Multi-agent research passes that have changed real strategic recommendations, not just summarised sources.
- 04
A written operating record
Every session closes out to an append-only log. Corrections are new entries, never edits — so the record can be trusted a year later.
159 products, 1,510 mapped cells
Catalog scale handled
Source-of-truth to storefront dry sync in about 30 seconds
Verified · Partner technical assessment · 2026-08-07
15
Clients served solo
Without a delivery team behind the sale
Verified · Client index · 2026-08
[NEEDS: measure, not estimate]
Hours returned per week
Currently unmeasured. Will not be published as a guess.
Not recomputed · Pending
Stated plainly. These are AI-assisted research, catalog, and reporting workflows deployed inside real delivery. They are not autonomous production software agents, and describing them that way would be a claim the evidence does not support.